Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 84-85, March 2009

When not to resuscitate the newborn baby

Bernard Schoonakker MBChB MRCPCH is a Consultant Neonatologist at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

Srinivas Nallagonda MBBS MRCPCH is a Specialist Paediatric Trainee at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

Abstract 

In the acute situation where an infant is born and needs resuscitation then the default should be to provide the necessary care. There may be situations where one would not want to initiate resuscitation as the consequences of initiating and sustaining resuscitation may result in an outcome that would not be desirable. Examples would be extreme prematurity beyond the margins of viability or where an infant has been given an antenatal diagnosis of a lethal condition. It is a prerequisite that the decision not to initiate resuscitation is the consensus of all those involved. In the absence of such a consensus the default would be to provide the care that is needed.

Keywords: best interest standard, consensus, extreme prematurity, resuscitation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1751-7214(08)00239-X

doi:10.1016/j.ogrm.2008.11.009

Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 84-85, March 2009