Malpositions and malpresentations of the foetal head

References 

1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence . Intrapartum care: management and delivery of care to women in labour. Clinical guideline no. 55 London: NICE; September 2007;
2. O'Driscoll K, Foley M, MacDonald D. Active management of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63:485–490
   • MEDLINE
3. Pearl ML, Roberts JM, Laros RK, Hurd WW. Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. Influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:955–961
   • MEDLINE
4. Sizer AR, Nirmal DM. Occipitoposterior position: associated factors and obstetric outcome in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5 Pt 1):749–752
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Fitzpatrick M, McQuillan K, O'Herlihy C. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:1027–1031
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
6. Oláh KS. Reversal of the decision for Caesarean section in the second stage of labour on the basis of consultant vaginal assessment. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25:115–116
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
7. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Nicolaides K. Intrapartum sonography to determine foetal occiputposition: intraobserver agreement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:421–424
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Howell C, Grady K, Cox C. Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma (MOET) course manual. Ventouse and forceps delivery. London: RCOG Press; 2007;
9. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Green-top guideline no. 26. Operative vaginal delivery. London: RCOG; October 2005;