Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 9, ISSUE 3, P170-172, September 1999

Consent in prenatal diagnosis

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chervenak F.
        • McCullough L.
        Ethics an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan Ultra.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 1: 18-20
        • GMC
        Seeking patient's consent: the ethical considerations.
        General Medical Council, London1999
      1. MB (1117) 2 FCR 541, 38 BMLR 175

        • Marteau T.M.
        Towards informed decisions about prenatal testing: a review.
        Prenat Diagn. 1995; 15: 1215-1226
        • Gekas J.
        • Gondry J.
        • Mazur S.
        • Cesborn P.
        • Thepot F.
        Informed consent to serum screening for Down's syndrome: are women given adequate information?.
        Prenat Diagn. 1999; 19: 1-7
        • Oliver S.
        • Rajan L.
        • Turner H.
        • et al.
        Informed choice for users of health services: views on ultrasonography leaflets of women in early pregnancy, midwives and ultrasonographers.
        BMJ. 1996; 313: 1251-1253
        • Keerigan D.
        • Thavasagayam R.
        • Woods T.
        • et al.
        Who's afraid of informed consent?.
        BMJ. 1993; 306: 298-300
        • Sadler M.
        Serum screening for Down's syndrome: how much do health professionals know?.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 176-179
        • Dormandy E.
        Better understanding of factors influencing uptake is needed.
        BMJ. 1998; 318: 805
        • Dodds R.
        The stress of tests in pregnancy: summary of a National Childbirth Trust antenatal screening survey.
        National Childbirth Trust, London1997
        • Marteau T.M.
        • Slack J.
        • Kidd J.
        • Shaw R.W.
        Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: practice observed.
        Public Health. 1992; 106: 131-141
        • Venn-Treloar J.
        Nuchal translucency - screening without consent.
        BMJ. 1998; 316: 1027
        • Proud J.
        • Murphy-Black T.
        Choice of a scan: how much information do women receive before ultrasound.
        Br J Midwifery. 1997; 1: 144-147
        • Baillie C.
        • Mason G.
        The psychological impact of obstetric ultrasound scans and soft marker screening.
        Imaging. 1997; 9: 115-122
        • Balhe C.
        • Hewison J.
        Obtaining selective consent to scanning, rather than screening, is possible BMJ.
        BMJ. 1989; 318: 805
        • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists study group
        Statistical aspects of screening for Downs Syndrome.
        in: Grudzinskas J.G. Ward R.H.T. Screening for Down syndrome in the first trimester. RCOG Press, London1997
        • Carroll S.
        Measurements give parents useful information.
        BMJ. 1998; 317: 748
        • McFadyen A.
        • Gledhill J.
        • Whitlow B.
        • Economides D.
        First trimester ultrasound screening.
        BMJ. 1998; 317: 694-695