Advertisement
Review| Volume 32, ISSUE 4, P56-60, April 2022

Download started.

Ok

Medicolegal issues in obstetrics

  • Pam Loughna
    Affiliations
    Pam Loughna MD FRCOG MRCGP Retired Senior Lecturer/Honorary Consultant Obstetrician, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK. Conflicts of interest: none declared
    Search for articles by this author
Published:March 17, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2022.02.002

      Abstract

      Patient complaints that lead to litigation are a common problem in obstetrics, and cost the NHS approximately £4.2 billion in 2020/21. Individuals resort to litigation for a number of reasons, including a desire to have questions answered and the need for financial recompense for damages. Litigation proceeds following a standard process through the civil courts, in which a judge determines the outcome if a case reaches court. The burden of proof required for successful litigation is the balance of probabilities rather than beyond all reasonable doubt. There are three core principles governing medical litigation: Bolam. Bolitho and Montgomery. Some legal cases could be avoided by a transparent response to complaints. Good record keeping and an honest approach to problems and adverse outcomes are recommended for all involved in clinical care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect